World Federation of Colleges and Polytechnics Outlines Strategies to Return to Training

The World Federation of Colleges and Polytechnics (WFCP) has released its first ever “Global Statement” calling on all vocational, professional and technical education and training institutions around the world to coordinate education, training and skills strategies that speed up economic and social recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic.

The statement – a major and extensively researched report – highlights the importance of professional, technical and vocational training in reshaping economies and ensuring that a post-pandemic global landscape has the requisite skills, knowledge and competencies to rebuild the global economy increasing its resilience for the future. (Download the full Statement in PDF here.)

“The WFCP statement has strong resonance for Australian vocational education and training (VET). It shows that Australia is not alone in the negative impact of COVID-19 on training, and the importance of re-engagement and return to training, especially for many disadvantaged learners who were unable or unwilling to shift their studies to online and remote learning,” said Dr Don Perlgut, CEO of Community Colleges Australia (CCA).

Selections from the Global Statement follow.

Impact of COVID-19 on Learning

Social distancing requirements disrupted the traditional face-to-face provision of education and training. A global survey of training providers carried out by the ILO, UNESCO and World Bank across 126 countries identified extensive disruption to teaching and learning, including:

  • A complete closure of training centres in 114 of the 126 countries surveyed
  • Significant disruption in assessments and examina­tions, with the assessment of practical learning out­comes being judged particularly difficult to assess
  • Particular difficulties for learners in acquiring hands-on experience due to the closure of businesses who would otherwise provide opportunities for work-based learning
  • Concerns around the challenges of engaging learn­ers using remote methods, with an increased risk of learners dropping out of courses
  • Significant challenges for teachers, including an increased workload associated with pivoting to remote learning, and in some cases

To support continuation of learning, many providers and education systems moved quickly to pivot to tech­nology-enabled distance learning. While the extent of closures varied across geographies, many systems are projecting significant learning loss.

Lack of reliable infrastructure led to differences in the extent to which learners were able to access remote learning. Within both high-income and low-income countries, dis­parities in access to the internet (or mobile data) and to devices led to inequalities in learner’s access, in spite of efforts by governments, private sector actors such as telecoms companies, and providers themselves to sup­port learners to overcome shortfalls in infrastructure.

While many innovative approaches to digital learning were developed over the course of the pandemic, it is more dif­ficult to provide quality distance learning alternatives for practical elements of VET courses. Experts have raised concerns about what is lost through VET that is delivered in the absence of “work con­text or the support of experienced workers and VET pro­fessionals”. Responding to COVID-19 has accelerated an existing wide-spread trend of digitisation of VET systems that was already taking place in further education systems.

Potential Solutions for VET Response, Recovery and Reimagination

Digital Provision

While very little VET provision can be solely deliv­ered online, there are some good examples of how provi­sion can be transformed to make the best of digital and in-person learning. It is important to distinguish however between the emer­gency deployment of education delivered using digital technology that we have seen during the pandemic, and the future opportunity to create VET systems making opti­mal use of Edtech (Commonwealth of Learning, 2020). A review of the use of digital technology during the pandemic by Jisc, the UK agency for digital technology in further education, concludes: “the use of technology was often simplistic and not always as engaging, exciting or collaborative as it could be. It sufficed as a stopgap but we need a more ambitious model for the future”.

There are significant opportunities to improve learner out­comes and experience through enhanced use of digital technology in VET systems:

  • Continued use of remote or blended learning to make it easier for those already in work (or with caring responsibilities) to access learning opportunities.
  • Enhancing student engagement with learning through gamification of learning, changes to learning design, and developing high-quality digital learning content.
  • Making use of virtual reality (VR) and simulation to allow learners to practice tasks without having to be in a workshop or real-world environment, allowing greater opportunities to practice hands-on elements of training using industry-standard materials and equipment that may otherwise be prohibitively expensive.
  • Using blended or flipped learning methods (which involve learners reviewing material in advance of a ses­sion, then discussing the topic in person during a ses­sion) to support more effective use of classroom time.
  • Using data from digital solutions to give early warn­ing of student disengagement, provide insights into learner performance, and enable greater personalisa­tion of learning

In countries that had been able to switch to online learning during the pandemic, there was significant praise for the work teachers had put in to adapt courses, but also a rec­ognition that the teaching and learning workforce more broadly need support to make the best use of digital tech­nology in future.

Also affecting teachers directly is the quality of digi­tal learning resources. While huge amounts of learning resources and digital content are available to support learning, including large amounts of open-source mate­rial, the quality of resources (in terms of both content and design/interactivity) is highly variable. There are also chal­lenges around the discoverability of high-quality resources.

Digital Infrastructure, Inequality and Expanding VET

The pandemic exposed the lack of digital infrastructure in almost every country in the world, whether for the major­ity of the population, for particular groups of people with­out access for financial or geographical reasons, or due to a lack of sufficient devices.

Digital learning requires access to devices, either for individuals, or through provision in public and commu­nity buildings like libraries and community centres. One workshop participant from Australia noted that their adult learners relied heavily on libraries and community cen­tres for internet access, and so it was incredibly difficult to support learners when these lifelines were shut during the pandemic. For many higher income countries, ensur­ing their learners had access to devices was also a chal­lenge, particularly in larger families or amongst those on lower incomes. Future extension of digital learning needs to take into account the ability of learners to access the internet on a suitable device from home, and have somewhere appropriate to study.

Inclusive Provision

Women, ethnic minorities, and older people have all been hit hard by the pandemic. Specific and targeted support for these groups already exists at many providers, but fund­ing, particularly in the long term, can be scarce. Provid­ers should ensure the design of such provision (including modes of delivery, outreach, and content) is inclusive and caters for new groups of learners entering the training sys­tem for the first time.

Programs for those returning to the workplace, whether women with caring responsibilities or older workers more generally, may require learning to be delivered in bite-size chunks, with learners building up qualifications over time. Ensuring that these kinds of programs continue to exist and are expanded after the pandemic will be crucial to ensuring training is accessible to these groups.

There is a need for main­tenance support for those needing to re-train: the availability of maintenance support is a key decid­ing factor for many people looking to change careers or gain the skills they need to move back into the workforce.

Micro-credentials

Many organisations across the world have experience of providing flexible learning in an informal way, but the greater use of online learning will likely create more oppor­tunities for learners to undertake more formal flexible learning, particularly through modules that are taught fully or mostly online. Flexible formalised learning can provide introductions to topics (often for young people or those unsure what course to take), very specialised learn­ing (for those in work or upskilling in a particular area), or something in-between.

Micro-credentials are one way that many providers, employers, or education systems have decided to accredit short mostly online courses. These credentials, which include ‘digital badges’ and certificates from MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) are used as a sup­plement traditional courses, or by established workers looking to learn something new. However, there are concerns about the recognition of these types of credentials, with many employers and recruiters reporting a low level of understanding of the value of these new kinds of accreditation, preferring to assess candidates for jobs based on more standard qualifications. There are concerns that micro-cre­dentials risk driving further growth in the ‘gig economy’, particularly in higher income countries, with their availabil­ity meaning employers can demand workers have specific skills evidenced through micro-credentials. Micro-credentials that only involve digital learning have similar challenges to those for wholly digital mainstream learning: lack of engagement with other learners or the teacher/lecturer and lack of abil­ity to include practical learning in person.

One of the advan­tages of micro-credentials is that they can be more acces­sible to those with additional challenges, for example due to disability, location of training provider, caring responsi­bilities, or work. Micro-learning can provide a way of learning and building up new skills more slowly (or more quickly) than traditional learning and at an appropriate pace for the learner. Despite the challenges, micro-credentials are still relatively new and could be a way of expanding VET provision to those who might not be able to access it.

Comments are closed.