Community education in vocational education and training: NCVER report shows that our numbers matter

By Don Perlgut, CEO, CCA

A just-released report from the National Centre for Vocational Education and Research (NCVER), entitled VET Provider Market Structures: History, Growth and Change, provides up-to-date numbers on why community education still matters to Australia.

This research paper utilises 2014 data to explore how national and historical policy changes have impacted the numbers and structure of the vocational educational and training (VET) provider market over the past 20 years.

The report’s “key messages” include:

  • During 2014, the community sector had 190,604 students, of the total student numbers of 4,008,489 (4.7%). The private (for-profit) sector had the largest number of students – 2,095,171 (52%) – with TAFE second with 1,115,865 (28%).  The community sector had approximately the same number of students as the schools and the associations sectors, and more than double the number of the enterprises sector. (See Table 1 below.)
  • Of the 497 community-based RTOs operating in 2014:   223 (45%) had 1-100 students, 227 (46%) had 101 to 1000 students, 46 (9%) had between 1001 and 10,000 students and only 1 provider reported an enrolment greater than 10,000.  In other words, 91% of community providers delivered to 1,000 students or less.  (See Table 2 below.)
  • While community providers are represented across all geographic categories, they play a particularly important role in regional areas, especially “inner regional”.  While TAFE and the schools sector are important players in regional areas, the private for-profit, associations and enterprises sectors are predominantly metropolitan.  This underlines the importance of the community sector to regional and rural Australia. (See Table 3 below.)
  • Despite news reports of extensive disruption in the VET sector, the number of VET providers have remained relatively stable for many years: “VET market reforms and changing funding regimes … appear not to have driven major changes in provider numbers, despite the underlying turnover of providers.”
  • The VET sector had almost 3 times as many students as the higher education sector in 2014, yet had 35 times as many providers.  As a consequence, the report raises questions about the business mass and the VET system’s capacity to regulate this number.  This finding underscores CCA’s commitment to enhancing the corporate governance and strategic capabilities of our members.

The report (page 9) notes that, “Over the past two decades the VET market has been increasingly opened up to competition. This has in part been driven by funding policy reforms that support greater contestability across the training market, thereby increasing the numbers of private and other non-government providers in a market historically dominated by the TAFE institutes.”

The report expresses some surprise on the different sizes of providers (page 23):  “The extraordinarily wide disparity between the sizes of providers clearly warrants further investigation and prompts questions such as: how have the largest providers in the market achieved their position, particularly the non-TAFE providers?”

Table 1: Training organisations and students by type, 2014 (Table 5, NCVER Report, page 18)

Type Providers Students Mean Median Minimum Maximum
Schools 960 202 415 211 82 1 16 832
TAFE 57 1 115 865 19 577 16 661 680 92 530
Universities 15 83 631 5 575 657 33 18 426
Enterprises 210 90 816 432 95 1 9 069
Community 497 190 604 384 129 1 10 900
Private 2 557 2 095 171 819 204 1 104 581
Associations 221 193 821 877 238 1 22 117
Other 87 36 166 416 80 1 8 815
Overall 4 604 4 008 489 871 146 1 104 581

Note: Some providers report data under multiple types, so the number of providers may differ from that reported in other publications. Students were also counted in each provider type in which they train. The NCVER notes that the “figure of four million may differ from other published figures because in this case students may have been counted multiple times if they train at more than one provider type.” Source: NCVER (2014).

 

Table 2: Number of providers by size band, 2014 (Table B1, NCVER Report, p. 35)

  1100 1011000 1001

10,000

10,000+ Total
Schools 533 414 9 4 960
TAFE 0 1 19 37 57
Universities 3 6 2 4 15
Enterprise 108 78 24 0 210
Community 223 227 46 1 497
Private 904 1 198 431 24 2 557
Associations 71 108 39 3 221
Other 49 31 7 0 87
Total 1 891 2 063 577 73 4 604

Note: Some providers report data under multiple types, so the number of providers may differ from that reported in other publications.  Source: NCVER (2014).

 

Table 3: Number of providers by remoteness, 2014 (Table B3, NCVER Report, p. 36)

  Major cities Inner regional Outer regional Remote Very remote Unknown Total
Schools 550 238 135 18 10 10 961
TAFE 28 17 8 3 1 6 63
Universities 6 6 1 1 0 2 16
Enterprise 155 20 14 2 0 23 214
Community 275 153 53 7 1 17 506
Private 1 974 345 143 14 5 119 2 600
Associations 170 31 12 1 1 12 227
Other 52 11 14 3 0 7 87
Total 3 210 821 380 49 18 196 4 674

Note: Providers can report under multiple types and remoteness categories and in this case they are counted under each category they appear, so the number of providers listed may differ from other publications.  Source: NCVER (2014).